COMPARATIVE STUDY OF FONT RECOGNITION USING CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORKS AND TWO FEATURE EXTRACTION METHODS WITH SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25195/ijci.v49i2.434Keywords:
Font Recognition, Convolution Neural Network, Support vector machine, Distance profile features, normalized central momentsAbstract
Font recognition is one of the essential issues in document recognition and analysis, and is frequently a complex and time-consuming process. Many techniques of optical character recognition (OCR) have been suggested and some of them have been marketed, however, a few of these techniques considered font recognition. The issue of OCR is that it saves copies of documents to make them searchable, but the documents stop having the original appearance. To solve this problem, this paper presents a system for recognizing three and six English fonts from character images using Convolution Neural Network (CNN), and then compare the results of proposed system with the two studies. The first study used NCM features and SVM as a classification method, and the second study used DP features and SVM as classification method. The data of this study were taken from Al-Khaffaf dataset [21]. The two types of datasets have been used: the first type is about 27,620 sample for the three fonts classification and the second type is about 72,983 sample for the six fonts classification and both datasets are English character images in gray scale format with 8 bits. The results showed that CNN achieved the highest recognition rate in the proposed system compared with the two studies reached 99.75% and 98.329 % for the three and six fonts recognition, respectively. In addition, CNN got the least time required for creating model about 6 minutes and 23- 24 minutes for three and six fonts recognition, respectively. Based on the results, we can conclude that CNN technique is the best and most accurate model for recognizing fonts.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
IJCI applies the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license to articles. The author of the submitted paper for publication by IJCI has the CC BY license. Under this Open Access license, the author gives an agreement to any author to reuse the article in whole or part for any purpose, even for commercial purposes. Anyone may copy, distribute, or reuse the content as long as the author and source are properly cited. This facility helps in re-use and ensures that journal content is available for the needs of research.
If the manuscript contains photos, images, figures, tables, audio files, videos, etc., that the author or the co-authors do not own, IJCI will require the author to provide the journal with proof that the owner of that content has given the author written permission to use it, and the owner has approved that the CC BY license being applied to content. IJCI provides a form that the author can use to ask for permission from the owner. If the author does not have owner permission, IJCI will ask the author to remove that content and/or replace it with other content that the author owns or has such permission to use.
Many authors assume that if they previously published a paper through another publisher, they have the right to reuse that content in their PLOS paper, but that is not necessarily the case – it depends on the license that covers the other paper. The author must ascertain the rights he/she has of a specific license (a license that enables the author to use the content). The author must obtain written permission from the publisher to use the content in the IJCI paper. The author should not include any content in her/his IJCI paper without having the right to use it, and always give proper attribution.
The accompanying submitted data should be stated with licensing policies, the policies should not be more restrictive than CC BY.
IJCI has the right to remove photos, captures, images, figures, tables, illustrations, audio, and video files, from a paper before or after publication, if these contents were included in the author's paper without permission from the owner of the content.