Artificial Intelligence Systems and Medical Negligence: An Overview and Perspective of a Case Study in Ghana Civil Procedure Rules, 2004 (C.I. 47)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25195/ijci.v50i1.494Keywords:
Medical Negligence, Artificial Intelligence, Machine learning, Evidence, LawAbstract
Objective: This article discusses the evidentiary requirements for demonstrating scientific negligence under Ghana’s Civil Procedure Rules 2004 (C.I. 47) in the context of emerging artificial intelligence (AI) diagnostic and treatment structures.
Method: Legal analysis examines gaps in satisfying burden of proof and standards of evidence, obstacles that restrict evidence collection on AI device deficiencies, and suggestions for adapting legal responsibility policies to AI’s technical opacity.
Findings: The present inability to interrogate algorithms, limited access to proprietary training data and methods, lack of diagnosed standards of care for software-based decision-makers, and shortage of qualified professional witnesses pose massive evidentiary challenges for plaintiffs seeking to confirm AI negligence.
Conclusions/Recommendations: Standards strengthening algorithmic transparency, auditability, and explainability could ease evidentiary burdens for affected patients. Strict liability schemes and IP protections balancing public safety and innovation aims need to be considered moving forward.
Scientific Contributions: This work adapts traditional medical liability systems to today’s realities of increasing reliance on AI in health care and proposes several improvements.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Iraqi Journal for Computers and Informatics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
IJCI applies the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license to articles. The author of the submitted paper for publication by IJCI has the CC BY license. Under this Open Access license, the author gives an agreement to any author to reuse the article in whole or part for any purpose, even for commercial purposes. Anyone may copy, distribute, or reuse the content as long as the author and source are properly cited. This facility helps in re-use and ensures that journal content is available for the needs of research.
If the manuscript contains photos, images, figures, tables, audio files, videos, etc., that the author or the co-authors do not own, IJCI will require the author to provide the journal with proof that the owner of that content has given the author written permission to use it, and the owner has approved that the CC BY license being applied to content. IJCI provides a form that the author can use to ask for permission from the owner. If the author does not have owner permission, IJCI will ask the author to remove that content and/or replace it with other content that the author owns or has such permission to use.
Many authors assume that if they previously published a paper through another publisher, they have the right to reuse that content in their PLOS paper, but that is not necessarily the case – it depends on the license that covers the other paper. The author must ascertain the rights he/she has of a specific license (a license that enables the author to use the content). The author must obtain written permission from the publisher to use the content in the IJCI paper. The author should not include any content in her/his IJCI paper without having the right to use it, and always give proper attribution.
The accompanying submitted data should be stated with licensing policies, the policies should not be more restrictive than CC BY.
IJCI has the right to remove photos, captures, images, figures, tables, illustrations, audio, and video files, from a paper before or after publication, if these contents were included in the author's paper without permission from the owner of the content.
